COMPARISON

Scam AI vs Truepic

Truepic focuses on content credentials and cryptographic photo provenance (C2PA standard) — verifying that images were captured by a real camera at a specific place and time. Scam AI takes a different approach, using AI to detect synthetic manipulation in any image or audio file regardless of provenance metadata.

FEATURE COMPARISON

Scam AI vs Truepic

Feature
Scam AI
Truepic
Detection approach
AI/ML deepfake detection
C2PA cryptographic provenance
Works on images without metadata
Yes
No — requires C2PA camera integration
Deepfake detection accuracy
98.2% (Eva-v1)
N/A — provenance, not detection
Free tier
200 images/month
No self-serve free tier
Audio / voice clone detection
Yes (98.5% accuracy)
No
API integration
Under 10 minutes
Camera hardware integration required
Works on historical images
Yes
Only future C2PA-signed images
Retroactive fraud detection
Yes
No
Document forgery detection
Yes
No
SOC 2 compliant
Yes
Not publicly confirmed

WHY TEAMS CHOOSE SCAMAI

The Scam AI advantage

No camera hardware required

Truepic’s C2PA approach requires images to be captured by C2PA-enabled cameras. Scam AI analyzes any image regardless of capture device or provenance metadata — including retroactive fraud detection on existing images.

Works on today’s images

C2PA provenance only covers future images captured by adopting cameras. Scam AI detects deepfakes in any existing image or audio file using AI analysis.

Voice clone and audio detection

Scam AI adds audio deepfake detection at 98.5% accuracy. Truepic focuses exclusively on visual image provenance.

KYC and fraud prevention built-in

Scam AI is purpose-built for identity verification, financial fraud, and KYC onboarding — not content provenance for publishers.

FAQ

Scam AI vs Truepic — Common Questions